Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Health Commun ; 36(13): 1805-1809, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32722954

RESUMO

The current study explored the preferences for and knowledge of weight-based terminology used in healthcare-related conversations, and descriptively compared the preferences of children, parents and healthcare professionals. In total, 86 children with overweight or obesity, 90 parents of children with overweight or obesity and 572 healthcare professionals indicated their preferences for 22 terms. When applicable, children and parents could indicate unfamiliarity with a term. Many children were unfamiliar with terms such as "adiposity"adipositas"" (93%), "BMI" (60%) and "morbid obesity" (53%). Children, parents and healthcare professionals disliked "fatadjective". All groups liked the terms "healthier weight" and "above a healthy weight". To conclude, children's, parents' and healthcare professionals' preferences for weight-based terminology are predominately congruent, except for "BMI". "BMI" is a popular term among healthcare professionals. It is recommended that healthcare professionals use terms that can be perceived as neutral or positive, such as "healthier weight", as this may contribute to a positive conversation which may lead to better compliance, and to avoid terms that can be perceived as judgmental, such as "fatadjective", as this may worsen the dialogue and relationship between families and healthcare professionals, and increase weight-based stigma. Healthcare professionals should be aware that children may be unfamiliar with some terms.


Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde , Pais , Criança , Comunicação , Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Sobrepeso
2.
Patient Educ Couns ; 103(9): 1692-1708, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32278626

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Cancer genetic counseling increasingly involves discussing uncertain test results, for example because multiple genes are sequenced simultaneously. This review was performed to provide insight into how counselors' communication of uncertain test results during genetic counseling for cancer affects counselors and counselees. METHODS: A systematic mixed studies review was undertaken to review research on the effects of communicating uncertain test results. Four databases were searched using a PICO search strategy. Study findings of articles meeting the inclusion criteria were synthesized narratively. RESULTS: Twenty-four articles were included. Uncertain test results encompassed either an inconclusive test result or a variant of unknown significance (VUS). Counselees involved almost exclusively women at risk of hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer. None of the articles reported effects on counselor outcomes. Counselee outcomes were categorized as cognitive, affective or behavioral. Interpretation of a VUS was overall reported as difficult, and counselees' distress and worry were repeatedly found to decrease over time after the discussion of any uncertain test result. For most other outcomes, findings were sparse and/or inconsistent. CONCLUSION: Evidence on effects on counselee outcomes is scant and inconsistent. Future studies are warranted to provide insight into how counselees and counselors are affected. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Clinical practice could benefit from guidelines on how to address uncertain test results during pre- and posttest genetic consultations.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/psicologia , Conselheiros/psicologia , Aconselhamento Genético/psicologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/psicologia , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Comunicação , Feminino , Testes Genéticos , Humanos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/genética , Satisfação Pessoal , Incerteza
3.
Child Care Health Dev ; 46(3): 369-380, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32037594

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although healthcare professionals often consider body weight a sensitive and difficult topic to discuss with children, a contextualized and comprehensive understanding of youth perspectives on weight-related words used in healthcare has yet to be established. This qualitative study aims to explore perspectives of Dutch children on the terminology healthcare professionals use when discussing weight. METHODS: Fourteen interviews and one focus group discussion were held with children (age 8-16) who were in care because of their weight. A toolkit with customizable interview techniques was used in order to facilitate reflection and tailor the interview to each respondent. A narrative content analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Respondents attached both clear and subtle differences in meanings to (certain) weight-related words. Their perspectives were not unanimous for any single word. Moreover, at times, respondents framed certain words in positive or negative ways or used a word they disliked to describe themselves. This illustrates that meanings of weight-related words are not fixed but context and situation specific. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that meanings children assign to weight-related words are shaped by their experiences in the broader social context, especially at school, as well as with (previous) healthcare professionals. It pointed towards the importance of bedside manner, acquaintanceship, and support. Healthcare professionals treating children because of their body weight are advised to invest in a good patient-caregiver relationship, pay attention to children's previous (negative) social weight-related experiences, and reflect critically on their own preconceptions about body weight and the impact these preconceptions might have on their patient-caregiver relationships.


Assuntos
Peso Corporal , Idioma , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Obesidade Pediátrica/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Bullying , Criança , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Masculino , Países Baixos , Relações Profissional-Paciente , Pesquisa Qualitativa
4.
Disabil Rehabil ; 42(21): 3052-3058, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30907148

RESUMO

Purpose: To qualitatively investigate changes in employment status, barriers to and facilitators of (return to) work in breast cancer survivors 5-10 years after diagnosis.Materials and methods: Women were eligible to participate in the focus groups if they were younger than 55 years and were employed at time of diagnosis. Data were analysed by two independent researchers using thematic content analysis.Results: Nineteen women participated in three semi-structured focus groups, of whom 18 reported a change in employment status 5-10 years after diagnosis. Perceived barriers to (return to) work shortly after breast cancer diagnosis tended to be disease- and treatment-related, while 5-10 years later, they were personal- and work-related. Participants recommended open communication and support at the workplace, and comprehensive information from (occupational) health care professionals to facilitate dealing with breast cancer at work.Conclusions: Breast cancer survivors still experience changes in employment status 5-10 years after diagnosis. (Occupational) health care professionals should be alert that perceived barriers for returning to work change over time. Future research should focus on increasing awareness (at work) of breast cancer survivors' needs, providing adequate information and support to all involved, and developing interventions to sustain survivors' work ability at the long term.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONEven long after diagnosis and treatment, a sizeable number of breast cancer survivors report a change in employment status, such as job loss.(Occupational) health care professionals should be alert that barriers for returning to work and retaining work change over time.There is a lack of awareness and a shortage of interventions regarding work-related issues for breast cancer survivors at long-term follow-up.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Sobreviventes de Câncer , Emprego , Feminino , Humanos , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Retorno ao Trabalho , Sobreviventes
5.
Fam Cancer ; 19(1): 65-76, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31773425

RESUMO

Pre-test counseling about multigene panel testing involves many uncertainties. Ideally, counselees are informed about uncertainties in a way that enables them to make an informed decision about panel testing. It is presently unknown whether and how uncertainty is discussed during initial cancer genetic counseling. We therefore investigated whether and how counselors discuss and address uncertainty, and the extent of shared decision-making (SDM), and explored associations between counselors' communication and their characteristics in consultations on panel testing for cancer. For this purpose, consultations of counselors discussing a multigene panel with a simulated patient were videotaped. Simulated patients represented a counselee who had had multiple cancer types, according to a script. Before and afterwards, counselors completed a survey. Counselors' uncertainty expressions, initiating and the framing of expressions, and their verbal responses to scripted uncertainties of the simulated patient were coded by two researchers independently. Coding was done according to a pre-developed coding scheme using The Observer XT software for observational analysis. Additionally, the degree of SDM was assessed by two observers. Correlation and regression analyses were performed to assess associations of communicated uncertainties, responses and the extent of SDM, with counselors' background characteristics. In total, twenty-nine counselors, including clinical geneticists, genetic counselors, physician assistants-in-training, residents and interns, participated of whom working experience varied between 0 and 25 years. Counselors expressed uncertainties mainly regarding scientific topics (94%) and on their own initiative (95%). Most expressions were framed directly (77%), e.g. We don't know, and were emotionally neutral (59%; without a positive/negative value). Counselors mainly responded to uncertainties of the simulated patient by explicitly referring to the uncertainty (69%), without providing space for further disclosure (66%). More experienced counselors provided less space to further disclose uncertainty (p < 0.02), and clinical geneticists scored lower on SDM compared with other types of counselors (p < 0.03). Our findings that counselors mainly communicate scientific uncertainties and use space-reducing responses imply that the way counselors address counselees' personal uncertainties and concerns during initial cancer genetic counseling is suboptimal.


Assuntos
Conselheiros/psicologia , Tomada de Decisão Compartilhada , Aconselhamento Genético , Testes Genéticos , Neoplasias/genética , Incerteza , Adulto , Comunicação , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Genética , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Herança Multifatorial , Países Baixos , Simulação de Paciente
6.
Oncologist ; 24(2): 259-265, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29959285

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Systemic treatment for advanced cancer offers uncertain and sometimes limited benefit, while the burden can be high. This study examines the effect of shared decision-making (SDM) training for medical oncologists on observed SDM in standardized patient assessments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial comparing training with standard practice was conducted. Medical oncologists and oncologists-in-training (n = 31) participated in a video-recorded, standardized patient assessment at baseline (T0) and after 4 months (T1, after training). The training was based on a four-stage SDM model and consisted of a reader, two group sessions (3.5 hours each), a booster session (1.5 hours), and a consultation card. The primary outcome was observed SDM as assessed with the Observing Patient Involvement scale (OPTION12) coded by observers blinded for arm. Secondary outcomes were observed SDM per stage, communication skills, and oncologists' satisfaction with communication. RESULTS: The training had a significant and large effect on observed SDM in the simulated consultations (Cohen's f = 0.62) and improved observed SDM behavior in all four SDM stages (f = 0.39-0.72). The training improved oncologists' information provision skills (f = 0.77), skills related to anticipating/responding to emotions (f = 0.42), and their satisfaction with the consultation (f = 0.53). CONCLUSION: Training medical oncologists in SDM about palliative systemic treatment improves their performance in simulated consultations. The next step is to examine the effect of such training on SDM in clinical practice and on patient outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Systemic treatment for advanced cancer offers uncertain and sometimes limited benefit, while the burden can be high. Hence, applying the premises of shared decision-making (SDM) is recommended. SDM is increasingly advocated based on the ethical imperative to provide patient-centered care and the increasing evidence for beneficial patient outcomes. Few studies examined the effectiveness of SDM training in robust designs. This randomized controlled trial demonstrated that SDM training (10 hours) improves oncologists' performance in consultations with standardized patients. The next step is to examine the effect of training on oncologists' performance and patient outcomes in clinical practice.


Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico/métodos , Oncologistas/educação , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Adulto , Tomada de Decisões , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...